Responsible Growth Coalition HomepageResponsible Growth Coalition

Encouraging transportation solutions consistent with safety, environmental, and wildlife core values.

  • We Are
    • People
    • History
  • We Believe
    • Our Perspective
  • At Issue
    • The Overriding Issue
    • Tribal Trail Connector
    • 4-Lane WY 22
    • East-West Connector
    • North Bridge or North Gondola?
  • Solutions
    • Bottleneck Management
    • Demand Management
    • Alternative Transportation
  • Voices
    • Public Input
    • Quotes
    • Recent Newsletters
  • Resources
    • Planning Documents
  • Act Now
    • Email Public Officials
    • Subscribe or Volunteer
    • Donate Now
  • Contact

February 1, 2017 By RGC Leave a Comment

Tribal Trails connector off SPET Ballot

The County Commissioners and Town Council members fully removed the design and the construction of a proposed Tribal Trails connector and East-West connector (named “South Park Road Network)” from the proposed May SPET ballot.

On January 23, they removed the construction portion and on January 30, at another public meeting, they removed the design portion. As promised, the valley-wide traffic study will be conducted and WYDOT will begin improvements to the Y intersection in August 2017.

Clearly, there is still resolve among certain elected officials to build these new roads in South Park. Several officials have indicated they plan to use other County funds to do what is needed to tee this up eventually as a new road project. Together, we will need to closely follow their efforts as this continues to unfold.

Many thanks to all who spoke at the meeting or sent in public comment. The comments were overwhelmingly against asking for funding of these new roads at this time.

More info:
SPET written Public Comments.
Today’s JH News & Guide article.
RGC’s Followup Letter.

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Press Tagged With: EWC, SPET, ttcr, Y Intersection

January 25, 2017 By RGC Leave a Comment

RGC provides SPET Ballot Comments

January 25, 2017

Dear County Commissioners, Town Council Members, and Staff:

We urge you to confirm your straw poll to remove the construction of two new roads, a Tribal Trails Connector (TTC) and East West Connector (EWC), from the SPET ballot. We thank you for listening to the voices of the community. Please use the SPET proactively to reduce the number of cars on the valley’s roads by making transit a viable choice:

1) Increase commuter service to Teton Valley and Star Valley
2) Add local and express runs with stops in South Park (below High School Road) and Wilson
3) Complete the START maintenance facility
4) Plan for and build park and ride commuter lots so drivers can get out of their cars.

To that end, we ask that you not seek SPET funds to design a TTC or EWC at this time. The reasons are simple. And, contrary to one public official’s assertion, we are not misinformed. We are engaged citizens asking our elected officials to honor their promises. We speak to uphold important community values embodied in the Comprehensive Plan: scenic beauty, wildlife, and open spaces.

Do the valley-wide traffic study you promised before seeking SPET funding to design a TTC or EWC. We urge that you not pave our scenic valley with new roads until the Y improvements are finished and current and historical traffic data demonstrably shows the need and a valley-wide network study is done. Please honor your promise to the community to conduct the valley-wide traffic study, already funded up to $150,000. Give yourselves and the public the time to consider the results of the study and decide on the appropriate next steps. Even the County Engineer recognized these civic responsibilities when, in talking about a TTC, he promised the community: “In order to complete all of the necessary steps and do our due diligence we need updated traffic information….Getting to the design phase will take at least a couple of years.” (7/27/16 JH News & Guide, p.1.) You risk losing significant credibility and public trust by breaking this promise and pushing ahead without the requisite data, modeling, and analysis.

Don’t ask for SPET funds to pervert the ITP Project Development Charter Process into a conceptual demonstration case for a TTC or EWC or to design new intersections on South Park Loop Road that experience no traffic. That would be getting the cart before the horse. First, The ITP contains a detailed project charter process that is robust, multi-layered, and involves meeting safety, environmental protection, and cost effectiveness objectives. It requires NEPA environmental review and appointment of a stakeholder oversight committee to provide advice at different stages of project design and development. The process is not merely a high-level, conceptual design, as proposed by one commissioner. Don’t create a new process to convince the community of a demonstration case for these new roads or intersections.

Second, please get the traffic data first to see if congestion exists at the two intersections on South Park Loop at Boyles Hill and High School Road mentioned by Commissioner Vogelheim. There is no traffic today of any kind at those intersections. We urge you not to try to reconfigure these particular intersections through SPET funds in an effort to showcase the impact of future South Park connectors to the community.
Don’t seek SPET funds to design a EWC, a road to nowhere. It is a highway bypass or an inappropriate and unnecessary economic benefit to large landowners or developers. You have committed to the public that you would first concentrate investments in affordable workforce housing in complete neighborhoods. South Park is a rural preservation area, not a complete neighborhood. The EWC has no purpose other than a highway bypass or an incentive for development for large landowners. The public should not pay for that type of incentive.

Address High School Road Traffic with Measures Other than New Pavement. If traffic exists on High School Road where most of the valley’s schools are located, do what other communities do. Encourage parents to send their children to school on school buses. Ask WYDOT to adjust the timing of the signal at High School Road and US 89 to allow more cars to quickly exit from High School Road. Consider using trained parent volunteers or traffic personnel to keep traffic moving at stop signs during drop off and pick up times of the day. In two years, hundreds of students will be heading south to a new school and their departure will result in further reduction of traffic on High School Road.
Thank you for considering our comments on the proposed SPET.

The Board of the Responsible Growth Coalition

Michele Gammer
Geoff Gottlieb
Lance Cygielman

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Public Input Tagged With: EWC, public comment, rgc, ttcr

June 8, 2015 By RGC

Mother’s ITP Safety Concerns

From: Adrianna Anderson

Date: June 8, 2015 at 7:14:35 AM MDT

To: commissioners@tetonwyo.org, council@townofjackson.com
Cc: sbirdyshaw@tetonwyo.org, awatkins@tetonwyo.org, county@jhnewsandguide.com

Subject: Teton County Resident with ITP Safety Concerns

Dear Commissioners & Town Council Members,

Thank you for your hard work and time dedicated to the ITP last week. Last Monday’s Joint Information Meeting was a long, informative session that provided many solutions as well as areas needing further exploration in the coming weeks regarding Teton County’s traffic situation. We trust that you will make the right call for Teton County and it’s inhabitants and I look forward to future discussions.

I am writing you today as a South Park resident and mother to two young children (6 & 9) who attend Jackson and Colter Elementary schools. My comments are regarding the proposed Tribal Trails Connector Road (TTCR) being built as a bypass in the South Park neighborhood. I am aware you have heard many rationale in favor and opposed to the TTCR and with so much information it can be challenging to sort through the minutiae of it all. I promise to stick to the facts of the matter.

While Mr. Charlier spent much time persuading how the TTCR would reduce traffic at the Y by up to 10,000 cars a day, he did little to provide rationale as to how the TTCR would not become a bypass for pass-through traffic. According to the study on South Park traffic by his competitor he mentioned (Teton County’s 2010 Felsburg South Park Study), Mr. Charlier states that most of the traffic using the TTCR would be South Park local traffic. When reading the study however, I was surprised to find that only 33% of traffic using the connector would be South Park “Local” residing traffic. The other 67% would be pass-through traffic. See details in traffic engineer Robert Bernstein’s Analysis of the 2010 Felsburg South Park Study.

How this increase in pass-through traffic will affect our children:

One of the main take-away points of the ITP is that Teton County’s goal is to increase pedestrian and bike traffic while decreasing vehicular traffic. A wonderful goal for our future indeed. While facing a 400-1,200% increase in traffic on many South Park roads that already deal with traffic congestion during school drop-off/pick-up times, how can a parent feel comfortable allowing their children to bike/walk to school and athletic practices? Daily I witness drivers failing to stop at cross walks for children and adults attempting to cross the road in school zones. What will be done to mitigate this blatant danger to our children? I find it contradictory that our county goal is to increase bike/pedestrian commuter traffic yet the proposed TTCR will make it more dangerous for our kids to get to school this way. I think you will find more parents driving their children to school if the TTCR is built thus nullifying our goal.

The thing I found troubling about Mr. Charlier’s comments was his attitude that addressing safety is not something that should be first and foremost. Comments like, “I’m not an advocate for writing a safety section” and “It’s essential to everything that’s in there but it’s not a separate topic” seemed lacking to me when referencing our most child-dense and sensitive zone in Teton County. His inability to provide details when questioned by Commissioner Newcomb on Charlier’s outline for safety consideration left me disappointed and feeling like this proposal hasn’t properly been vetted. Perhaps an independent child-safety analysis would be prudent?

When asked by Commissioner Vogelheim if roundabouts in the TTCR proposal would mitigate traffic, Mr. Charlier’s answer was, “You really don’t know until you get into the details of project planning”. The impression I got was that this is a plan that has been drafted yet details of safety mitigation and how to protect our children have not been fully thought out. Is this how Teton County works? Vote on a road rife with child safety concerns yet wait until later to find out if the risk is worth it? I believe our kids deserve better from us, the adults who are granted the honor of keeping them safe and out of harm’s way.

These are the questions that keep me up at night and I feel you have the power to challenge our county engineers and planners as to giving us the full story before a vote comes to order. I disagree with Mr. Charlier about the details; the details are where we are going to find out if the risk to our children’s safety is worth easing congestion at the Y. If you also felt like vital information was lacking, I urge you to please dig deeper on this one.

Please feel free to contact me to discuss this further.

Sincerely,
Adrianna Anderson

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Filed Under: Public Input Tagged With: letters, public comment, ttc, ttcr

Plans and Policies

Developer uses several tactics to discourage cars

‘Jackson Hole is open’ to visitors as plan to address highway landslide takes shape, officials say

Commissioners Compromise our Ecosystem

Development Roars on, and We Foot the Bill

Public Input

Commissioners Compromise our Ecosystem

Pothole Boondoggle

The Paradox of Tribal Trail Build Options

RGC Comments to 4/27/22 Open House

Traffic Studies

‘Jackson Hole is open’ to visitors as plan to address highway landslide takes shape, officials say

Commissioners Compromise our Ecosystem

Paid Parking for Teton Pass?

Gondola Could Relieve Traffic in Utah Ski Town

Press

‘Jackson Hole is open’ to visitors as plan to address highway landslide takes shape, officials say

Commissioners Compromise our Ecosystem

Development Roars on, and We Foot the Bill

Pothole Boondoggle

Contracts

Study will create new traffic modeling system

DONATE to RGC and help encourage responsible transportation planning.

Get news and updates:



Copyright © 2025 Responsible Growth Coalition